Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role
wilburnsamuel edited this page 6 months ago


The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebrities were notably consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable websites offering both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to point out claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as conventional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business deals with allegations of illegal gaming in a New York claim that declares VGW uses celebrity endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a range of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions between conventional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are totally free
bit.ly
Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before pivoting to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never offered up.'

The inconsistency between sports betting websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the choice to buy valueless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be used to unlock various features within the games.
bet9ja.com
But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting consumers to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all but 7 states, which has helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require normally need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.
bet9ja.com
Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to submit mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, thus providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important difference between social sweeps and standard online gaming sites like gambling establishments.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win profitable prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself doesn't satisfy the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all sort of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, usually 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the typical payout portion for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the earnings made by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for real rewards. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually because been shuttered over accusations of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been cited by courts and state lawyer generals as essential factors in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in fact a guise for illegal sports betting.'

Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are giving up considerable tax and income opportunities as this gambling changes that conducted through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.
bet9ja.com
Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
bet9ja.com
In the current suit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually also been named as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We usually don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.
bet9ja.com
'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not only terrific video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly typical throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely defend any claim which might be brought against us.'

The problems between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos might show troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position against illegal gaming - particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting supposedly prohibited sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.
bet9ja.com
Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our values are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton